Last night CNN hosted the 2nd republican debate in 2 stages. Yes, the field of presidential hopefuls for the republicans is so large you can't even do it all at once.
This highlights a question I have about debates this large. Would it be more beneficial for a candidate to refuse to attend? Certainly if you're running at the bottom of the pack and your'e almost sure to receive only a few questions it would be far better for you to simply refuse to attend and watch the media go crazy.
On todays show I want to break down the debate in a way you won't see it done in by the mainstream media. While they all focus on the spat between Carly and Donald, or Chris Christies appeal to the "working man" I'm going to spend time focusing on the candidates responses to the few policy questions they actually answered.
My hope is that you'll see what I saw. A bunch of people who have no real understanding of rights, of economics or history. It's a fun and exciting show. Check it out.