WWJD has been commonly understood as "What Would Jesus Do." That will not be the direct focus of this program. WWJD, in this context, is Who Would Judges Defend?
We exist in a world where Judgment has been determined to be a very negative thing. Organizations have been created to prosecute people for making undesirable judgments against the those who seemingly do not have a voice. In every spectrum is the condemnation of opinion that does not abide by a certain set of ebbing principles. Ebbing because it is never constant or universally applicable. So, the problems in judgment, standards and defending the "innocent" becomes chaotic if everyone is able to have their own interpretation of standards, defending, and judgment. We need ti have one interpretation to avoid confusion and common ground for decent communication.
What are standards?
Who is to be defended?
Why become judges?